Template:Did you know nominations/Agastachys
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Agastachys, Persoonia gunnii, Persoonia muelleri
[edit]( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that the white waratah, mountain and Mueller's geebungs are three members of the protea family found only in Tasmania?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rufe Persful, Template:Did you know nominations/Walthamstow by-election, 1897, Template:Did you know nominations/Janabiyah
- Comment: just thought the names were funny enough sounding to make it interesting....
Created/expanded by Casliber (talk), Wriekhathaar (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 14:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Summary:
- 1st: new article, 1507 characters; hook fact needs an inline citation
- 2nd: expansion, 361*5=1801 needed, at 1836; source says it's present, but not explicitly endemic to Tasmania
- 3rd: expansion, 50*5=1500 needed, now at 1646; same issue as #2.
Does the Flora of Australia Online website implicitly only include species that are endemic to Australia. If yes, is this sufficient to count as proof of endemicity? Not sure ... Sasata (talk) 06:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Good question - the Flora will note everywhere a species is found. For instance, Banksia dentata extends into PNG and Indonesia and this is noted. Hence the whole range is listed. So all native flora are covered, most of which are endemic. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:16, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
