The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Created by JJonahJackalope (talk). Self-nominated at 05:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC).
Excellent article, well-sourced, and certainly long enough. I'd say this is headed for FA status. The NYT source checks out, but the LA Times does not because that's a story before the march projecting the size. Regardless, the NYT is enough to sustain this hook. Earwig's tool doesn't pick up anything concerning, just properly attributed quotes and phrases like "civil rights movement". Gamaliel (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)