Talk:Zack (given name)

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

Moved, 25 March 2023, to Zack (given name), see discussion.
No consensus, 8 November 2024, to Zach (given name), see discussion.

Untitled

Is Zak short for Isaac and Zachariah too ? PeterGrecian 11:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the opening line of this article as zac etc. is not always a shortened version of zachary, granted it is common, but there are some people who are called just zac/zak/zack —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.116.73 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 30 July 2007

Requested move 25 March 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 20:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zack (personal name) → Zack (given name) – "(given name)" is the usual disambiguator for this type of page. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per reason given.★Trekker (talk) 16:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 22:53, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support move per nom. O.N.R. ^(talk) 00:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. The standard qualifier. Narky Blert (talk) 11:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support and snow close. Unanimous support and approaching the backlog. --Killuminator (talk) 14:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 8 November 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. The discussion became about splitting, which isn't handled with RM. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frost 05:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zack (given name) → Zach (given name) – The article should be moved to a page called Zach (given name) as that is by far the most common spelling, evidenced by the article itself, in which "Zach" appears at an almost 2:1 ratio with the second most common spelling "Zack." Zahonzik (talk) 21:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Split. "Zach" and "Zack" are distinct. 162 etc. (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The RM seems reasonable per Ngram[1] and Trends[2] but I'm curious if there are guidelines or norms that should inform the decision. My intuition is that "Zach" and "Zack" are usually considered variants of the same name/hypocorism and that splitting would be unhelpful and would raise the question of whether we need separate lists or articles for Zak, Zakk, and Zac.--MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 00:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See Shawn/Sean, or Roger/Rodger, or many more such examples currently on Wikipedia. 162 etc. (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, thanks. I was interested in other names with common hypocorisms. I see we have articles for Jonathan_(name) and John_(given_name) plus Johnathan, Johnny, Jonny, and Jon; Michael_(given_name) and Micheal which is described as a distinct name but also a spelling variant… [that] is sometimes considered erroneous plus Mikey, Mike (given name), and Mikee. I don't intend to look up the tens of thousands of possible examples. I guess I'm at weak split Zach and Zack. If Mikee gets its own list then I guess Zac, Zak, and Zakk can, too… I would prefer one list @ "Zach" but I don't have a strong argument for it. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 18:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Split, there's enough here to make two suitably long full length lists, per the analysis above. Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Split the article into Zack, Zach, Zac, Zak, and Zakk. The names are distinct and there is enough content to make several articles. Theparties (talk) 19:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.