Talk:York–Scarborough line

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article lacks references.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal York–Scarborough line is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:York to Scarborough Line.

This has appeared on the clean up list because citation number 2 has no access date and no URL. There is no URL for Toady's Railways UK other than websites offering it for sale (which makes it all a bit Tawdry) and as a consequence the URL access date will not activate. Help please....? The joy of all things (talk) 22:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Redhill to Tonbridge Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:16, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Waterloo to Reading Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Thornbury Branch Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on York–Scarborough line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151210182929/https://www.york.gov.uk/press/article/1144/water_end_flood_defences_work_starts to https://www.york.gov.uk/press/article/1144/water_end_flood_defences_work_starts

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content missing

Hello, fellow Wikipedians. As I am new to editing, I thought I would simply flag up a problem with this page and hope that more experienced contributors might solve the problem. When I looked up this page on 22 August 2022, there looked to be something wrong with it. I think a lot of content has been deleted, and there is something wrong with the formatting. Can anyone help fix it? Many thanks! PeterNimmo (talk) 22:05, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PeterNimmo: Hello, the page has not changed since June, but it could be one of the templates. May be you could indicate where you think there is a problem. Keith D (talk) 22:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]