Talk:Working on a Dream

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chart performance: Propose to remove the number of weeks spent at peak position

I believe that the number of weeks spent at the peak position that we have in the current version of the article should be removed. Rationale:

Per guideline in WP:CHARTS, "Weeks spent at peak position should be mentioned within the article text and not inserted into the table."
I never saw this in any other article.
It's difficult to source, as each week would in most cases demand a separate reference.
It's easy to get wrong; for example the article currently claims that the album has spend 4 weeks as #1 in Denmark. This is untrue; it was #1 in weeks 5 [1], 7 [2] and 8 [3] but not in week 6 [4].

In order not to stir up an edit war I prefer to discuss it here, rather than just removing them. Any thoughts? – IbLeo (talk) 21:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done per above, as nobody have objected. – IbLeo (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]