Talk:Women's rights in Afghanistan

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Women's rights in Afghanistan redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Afghanistan High‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History High‑importance

	History portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism High‑importance

	Feminism portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies

This redirect is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this redirect, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

This redirect is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Update With Current State of Affairs

This article should likely be updated with more information on the current state of affairs. National Geographic Magazine had a relevant article on the topic in their December issue, which brought my attention to this page. I plan to spend some time over the coming days to assess the needs and update the page. It actually won't require too much to bring this up to a higher rating. —Zujine|talk 06:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Self-immolation

Source [1] The article should mention this.--Cattus ^talk 10:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reforms in the royal era

The reforms during the period of 1920s-1973 seem forgotten in this article. In 1959, I believe, the veil was declared voluntary in the big cities and women were allowed to study and work professionally. This may have affected only urban elite women, but it remains important to mention. THis is currently missing in the article and should be added by someone with references--Aciram (talk) 16:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Women's rights in Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208145519/https://t-o-i.org/what-we-do-2/diy-creations/ to https://t-o-i.org/what-we-do-2/diy-creations/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Islam editors

This article appears to attract anti-Islam/anti-Muslim editors. The women in Afghanistan are not much different than the women in other Muslim countries. In other words, they are the same as women in Iran, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, etc, and the article should emphasize as such. Those who edit this article should keep in mind that every woman in Afghanistan strictly follows Islam. Everything Islam forbids is forbidden in Afghanistan. There are many evil people around the world who are attacking Islam on every front. Afghan women knowingly and intentionally do not want to live their life like the women in Western countries (non-Muslim countries). That would be against Islam. For example, women in Western countries are free to legally engage in every form of pornography, including oral and anal sex, have sex with many men before marriage, etc. In Afghanistan this is unacceptable by the entire nation and it does not exist, which is obviously good. More women in every Western country are murdered,[2] raped and violently abused than women in Afghanistan. Yet, these anti-Islam editors come here to try to make the clean Afghan women look bad. Just because a specific Afghan woman becomes a victim of a crime does not mean this is an accepted practice in Afghanistan. Many criminals in Afghanistan are actually killed by the victim's family or relatives (mafia style). In short, Islam protects women against every evil. If you can't see this you're spiritually blind. I'm Muslim and I'll never marry any woman who is not Muslim. I'm free to love whoever I want and reject whoever I want.--39.40.119.9 (talk) 08:03, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:AadaamS

User:AadaamS is editing this article in bad faith. He's trying to make Islam appear ugly in the eyes of the world. He realized that I'm editing from an Islamic country and began reverting me. I'm not trying to make Islam the best religion in the world. It is what it is. Afghan women love their religion, their way of life, and their Afghan men. Some are victims of crime but that happens everywhere in the world. How can 90% of women in Afghanistan be sexually assaulted by their family members? No ordinary human would even think about accepting such nonsense. Who went door to door to every house in Afghanistan to do this survey? We all know that millions of enemies of Islam are using the media to spread lies about Islam. This is played out now, only children still do this. The information reported in news must be properly read and interpreted correctly in Wikipedia. Women in Afghanistan are very protected compare to women living in Christian nations. But Wikipedia articles are trying to say the opposite. Women in Afghanistan had difficulties only for 5 years in late 1990s under Taliban regime but that has changed now. I improved the article please respect my edits. I'll do more edits when I have time so readers can get accurate image of how life is in Afghanistan for women.--39.40.83.143 (talk) 09:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit contents solely based on other users' motivations. If you suspect some existing contents with sources are incorrect, please provide other reliable sources which solidly contradict these previous sources. Please also keep in mind that new contents you're trying to add should come with sources. Minussquareofa (talk) 13:46, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any content in the article must be cited to a WP:RS published reliable source - personal experience does not count. AadaamS (talk) 06:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I cited US military source, which is more reliable and neutral. Only people familiar with Afghanistan's culture should edit this article. Every news report cited in this article is written by non-Afghans, often by those who only want to criticize. If Afghan women are deprived of their rights then a source should be presented where Afghan women are complaining. Why are non-Afghans speaking on behalf of Afghan women?--39.40.162.49 (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per Only people familiar with Afghanistan's culture should edit this article. - there is no such Wikipedia policy or guideline. In fact Wikipedia works the other way around, any editor from any country is allowed (and even encouraged) to edit articles about any other country. Also, material WP:V verified by WP:RS sources cannot be deleted. However, more material can be added using other sources. AadaamS (talk) 06:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bedrock rule on planet earth. Wikipedia rules are created by editors and they change daily. It's always preferable to bring experts on Afghanistan to edit this article. I'm one of those.--39.40.46.9 (talk) 19:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]