This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
How can he be hereditary King of Lithuania, as his ancestors were never crowned, and the state is over 85 years a republic? --Lokyz08:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see that (just as in the article "Karl Anselm, Duke of Urach") the bit about this man being "pretender to the throne of the Kingdom of Lithuania (with the irredentistic pretension to Latvia)" has been readded ([1]) with the edit summary "He's the direct descendant and heir of the first, only and last King. Do the Orléans need a source to be the heirs of France?". Now, of course, the answer to that question is "Yes", as original research, while a good thing in articles of scientific journals, is completely unacceptable in Wikipedia's articles. And there is a reason for that: who are we - random (and often anonymous) strangers who edit Wikipedia - to make our opinions on the matter worth noticing? So, if there is no source, the should be no mention of "being the pretender", especially given the policy Wikipedia:Biographies of living people.
And furthermore - should the whole article exist? Practically all information in this article is already given in the article "Duke of Urach", while almost everything else either should be removed anyway, or probably should be given there. Essentially the only sentence sourced to what might be a reliable independent source is "He is described as an engineer who lives at Ossenberg Castle near Düsseldorf."... So, wouldn't it be better to make this article a redirect to that one? --Martynas Patasius (talk) 18:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's not just the Lithuanian aspect, but the current Duke owns Lichtenstein Castle that is visited by hundreds of thousands of tourists every year, and some of them may want to know who owns it. Besides the subject will remain notable in other languages.PatrickGuinness (talk) 11:59, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's no German or Lithuanian Wikipedia article for the subject, what do you mean when you say the subject is notable in other languages?
Regarding ownership of Lichtenstein Castle - that in itself is not valid grounds for notability. Anyway most of the sources I see on a quick search about ownership of it say Urach family, not Wilhelm Albert himself. D1551D3N7 (talk) 14:13, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
