Talk:White Line (Montreal Metro)

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 August 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

This article lacks references.

Canada: Quebec / Montreal Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Quebec may be able to help!

Date of Removal from Metro Maps

The article says maps officially included the white line until 1990. However, although I did not move to Montreal until late 1993, I remember seeing the dotted white line of the proposed route on all the Metro maps for at least a couple of years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.70.250.50 (talk) 17:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pix-IX tram line

Shouldn't something be mentioned about the tram line that used to run on Pie-IX? This would have been the spiritual successor to that. 76.66.196.139 (talk) 10:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]