Talk:WLAJ-DT2

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
	This redirect is supported by the Television stations task force.

Michigan

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan

Fair use rationale for Image:Wbl logo.gif

Image:Wbl logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lansing cw.PNG

Image:Lansing cw.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to WLAJ

@Spshu, per redirect of this article to WLAJ. I don't find multiple (or any) clear guidance in TVS about removing unsourced articles. Please specify the discussion(s).

Also, this article contains unique content. If you feel the article has content problems, either tag it with Template:Unreferenced so others may source it, or merge/propose merging content into WLAJ. --Chaswmsday (talk) 23:02, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is clear guidance that subchannel do not automatically receive their own article as they have generally been forks of the station article. If you feel the article contains unique content then merge it with the main article and get it sourced. Unsourced material may be removed without discussion, the onus is on the adding editor not the removing editor like you imply. By making a redirect, I leave the information available to editors to move to the main article while a deletion request will delete the information. In fact, the article was tagged back on February 28, 2013 for notability, while another editor removed it improperly, it still was tagged. Spshu (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]