Talk:WETA-TV
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tucker Carlson: Unfiltered
[edit]"Recently, WETA has produced Tucker Carlson: Unfiltered, hosted by conservative commentator, Tucker Carlson as part of the Republican effort to make PBS more conservative. Despite the controversy generated, WETA continues to be regarded as a positive force in the Washington, DC area."
I feel strongly that PBS has moved recently to balance itself, and the Republican Party had little directly to do with it. The above statement is clearly of the point of view that the Republicans are ruining public television. I propose to either delete the segment of text, or to change it as follows:
"Recently, WETA has produced Tucker Carlson: Unfiltered, hosted by conservative commentator, Tucker Carlson as part of an effort to provide a balanced perspective. WETA continues to be regarded as a positive force in the Washington, DC area."
Old Blindness Movie
[edit]I recently posted an inquiry about an old movie i saw in the 80s on WETA. Please see "Talk:Blindness" for the deatils. it was about a guy stung by a big plant who woke up the morning after a comet visited earth to find everyone having gone blind. Would really like to remember the name. -Husnock 18:25, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Weta.gif
[edit]File:Weta.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 09:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Author, Author!
[edit]as near as I can tell from the WETA website, this podcast ended in 2008. If so, I question whether it is still relevant, particularly in view of all the other currently produced programs and podcasts that are not mentioned in the article. GodaiNoBaka (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation
[edit]There should be a disambiguation from WETA workshops https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C4%93t%C4%81_Workshop , particularly as both operate in the same industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.93.146.3 (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class Television stations articles
- Low-importance Television stations articles
- Television stations task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class Virginia articles
- Low-importance Virginia articles
- WikiProject Virginia articles
- Start-Class Maryland articles
- Mid-importance Maryland articles
- WikiProject Maryland articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class District of Columbia articles
- Unknown-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- Start-Class West Virginia articles
- Mid-importance West Virginia articles
- WikiProject West Virginia articles
- WikiProject United States articles