Voivode of Transylvania (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 3 February 2021 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
I have been desperately trying to understand the aim of the recent edits by Raysdiet. I can accept that the Romanian name of the rivers should be added, but I do not see what is the reason of changing other names. Borsoka (talk) 16:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I am surprised by the above answer. Why do you think that addign multiple names contradicts to the requirement of neutrality? Borsoka (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Hortobagy, my above answer still remained unanswered. Why do you think that deleting alternative names from this article contribute to its improvement?
