Talk:Voice analysis
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]i want to mke my vocal sond sweet?
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Erikssonfel, Sibyl.ambazhachalil. Peer reviewers: TaLang, Gabs418.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 6 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Estefanym177, Taylinleib.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 4 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cfrascino, JuliaGu516, Devinnatishyn, Lindsayrubes429. Peer reviewers: Devinnatishyn.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Edits in Use in Forensics
[edit]Hello! I've made some major changes to the Use in Forensics section as the bulk of it was copied straight from the LiveScience article it was citing. To do that, I rewrote a majority of it and added two more sources. I've also changed two sentences that exhibited subjectivity ("gained notoriety" in regards to whom? and "sole evidence"), as well as rewrote the "sole evidence", as it was a claim with no backing.
However, it's still pretty bare-bones and could use some more sources to back everything up. The section was short before the edits, so maybe there could be a bit more on prior notable cases? Though, that's just one suggestion to extend it a bit. JuliaGu516 (talk) 01:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
In addition, all of the edits I did were from User:Cfrascino/sandbox JuliaGu516 (talk) 01:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Other Major article edits
[edit]Hello, I moved the section that was called 'Typical voice problems' to after 'Analysis methods', because that section seemed better to start the article with. I also renamed it to 'Use in medicine' to fit with the pattern of 'Use in forensics'. In addition, I added some information with sources. Several edits were made to 'Forensic Voice' with new information and sources. I also deleted the part saying "Anyone working with voice will be able to analyse the characteristics of a voice, for example accents and dialects, any voice disguise, stress in speech, tones of voice, multiple speakers, and voice affected by intoxication, fatigue, and bad health," because it was not cited and didn't really seem helpful. I also added some information about inverse filtering to 'Analysis methods', but that section still does need work about electroglottography and other citations. The article also contains several small edits to better fit Wikipedia's style. As above, the edits are all from User:Cfrascino/sandbox . Devinnatishyn (talk) 02:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)