Talk:Vintage Guitars

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 1 November 2022 by reviewer EchidnaLives (talk · contribs).

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Musical Instruments Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Vintage Guitars is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Small NPOV issue

Hello, I've approved this article as I believe it is good enough, however the end of the history paragraph is a bit biased. Not enough for me to decline or delete the article, but just enough for me to bring it up here.

Courtesy ping: @Crossyfix. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 23:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EchidnaLives: Do you mean the part about best-selling models or the one about the homeless busker? I guess the first one might sound kinda biased and the second is trivial. I can remove the "which are considered Vintage's best-selling models" part and the entire thing about the busker. Crossyfix (talk) 08:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]