Talk:Ven Conmigo (album)

Ven Conmigo (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 2, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Latin music: Regional Mexican music High‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Regional Mexican music task force.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on May 18, 2018.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Fair use rationale for Image:Venconmigo1.jpg

Image:Venconmigo1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ven Conmigo (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MX (talk · contribs) 17:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for reviewing. I'll be taking care of this tomorrow. Best – jona ✉ 20:54, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AJona1992: Please let me know if you will be able to take care of the inquiries below before the end of the week. MX (✉ • ✎) 15:38, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have fixed everything you have raised here in the review. The only thing I did not do is the source for the 180,000 number, as the source is listed there as #25 source #50 is for the units it has sold from a different source as it does not represent the shipment certification number listed by the RIAA. Best – jona ✉ 15:35, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Done with review. MX (✉ • ✎) 20:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead paragraph

following a woman's struggles after many failed relationships. – Was this specifically to women? In the body it just mentions failed relationships. Could it be that it applied to all sexes? MX (✉ • ✎) 20:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Selena chronology and Selena studio album chronology – Please spell "Éxitos". In addition, do you know what the policy is for chronology in infoboxes? I'm asking because Mis Primero Exitos and Entre a Mi Mundo are not mentioned elsewhere in the article. Per WP:INFOBOXCITE, info in the infobox has to be cited elsewhere in the body paragraphs. Would you check / be able to fix this?

Production and development

division with Jose Behar as president – José

the Los Dinos band continued to tour with her – I'm a native Spanish speaker, so I'm a bit biased with this. But shouldn't you consider removing "the" from Los Dinos. The sentence is fine without it.

Recording and composition

Ven Conmigo has been described as containing half cumbias and half rancheras. – I don't want this to be flagged with "According to whom?" How do you feel about removing "has been described as" and just state what it includes? You do it in the following sentence anyways.

Abraham Quintanilla, Jr.—the group's manager (A.B. Selena, and their sister Suzette's father) – Who is Suzette? You don't want readers to stop right here and look up who this person is. Why not simply stick to Selena's father, which readers will know is also A.B.'s father since they read he was her sibling just earlier.

Patoski though the song was – thought

thought [sounded] better" recalled Pérez – I would link Chris Pérez. No mention of this person before in the sections (he is in the lead, but since you introduced/linked everyone again in the sections, I rather you do that here too for consistency).

track that Suzette compared to a – if you decide to remove Suzette per the suggestion above, you can introduce this person now.

Promotion

A.B. discovered 17-year old Chris Pérez, – link Chris in the previous mentioned and then remove link here and keep his last name.

A.B persuaded Quintanilla Jr. – period after B.

She later shared another venue with Ramon Ayala, – Ramón

Author Joe Nick Patoski described Pérez' choreography – Correct me if I'm wrong. Should it be Pérez's?

Critical reception

and 17 Super Exitos contributed to the $5 billion – The word éxitos has an accent. Same goes for súper (in Spanish), though I don't think they added it officially for her album. Can't expect everyone to know accent rules I guess...

Track listing

All good here

Credits and personnel

All good here

Charts

All good here

Weekly charts

All good here

Year-end charts

All good here

Certifications and sales

180,000 – Please add a source here like you did for the other small claims in the boxes.

Sources

Pérez 2012. – I think you might need a page for Source #19, since it is a book.

Article ready for promotion. MX (✉ • ✎) 22:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.