Talk:Vegetable

Vegetable has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 3, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Plants High‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Veganism and Vegetarianism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Citation #5 no longer accurate

The quoted definition does not appear on Dictionary.com 38.101.95.140 (talk) 15:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article still accurately reflects the meaning of the source, we don't say it's a direct quote, so I don't think it matters that they've made their definition more granular than ours. There's a 1:1 relationship between 'Parts of a plant' and ' fruit, seeds, roots, tubers, bulbs, stems, leaves, or flower parts' JeffUK 12:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Venn diagram

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.36.103.36 (talk) 12:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC) [reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The Venn diagram supporting the fruits/vegetables explanation has been serving this article for more than one decade, and it has been removed without discussion. Please reinstate and discuss rationale for removal. Thanks. 2.36.103.36 (talk) 07:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JeffUK: I'm inclined to support your removal, but could you explain this to IP user? Lemonaka (talk) 12:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, thanks for pinging me.

I simply don't think it adds any information to the article. It purports to "show the overlap in the terminology of "vegetables" in a culinary sense and "fruits" in the botanical sense." however all it does show is that tomatoes are both culinary vegetables and botanical fruits.

Also, the image is low quality, it looks dated with the various different resolutions and scales; I have, in its place, put in a photo that's also on the Fruit page, which I think is more illustrative and better quality.

JeffUK 12:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, in essence, WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT. End of the discussion then. 92.4.168.91 (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drill

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

please change ((drill))s to ((Drill (agriculture)|drills)) 2601:541:4580:8500:54F4:1F4E:C7F4:8429 (talk) 02:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for pointing out the error. HiLo48 (talk) 02:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 April 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

CHANGE the link to the ISO standards in reference n.45 https://web.archive.org/web/20120922003203/http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_ics/catalogue_ics_browse.htm?ICS1=67 TO https://www.iso.org/ics/67.080/x/ (use current URL instead of the web archive URL). Gigipri (talk) 14:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both the original and archive URLs were in the old reference; it was just because the original URL was dead that the template shows the archive URL before the original. The new site seems better though, so I've replaced the reference. Liu1126 (talk) 17:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]