Talk:United States recognition of the Golan Heights as part of Israel

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 March 2019. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States recognition of the Golan Heights as part of Israel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Israel High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page.
Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration.
Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005
Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel.
Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah
See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia.
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data.
Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes.
Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention.
Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Wikipedia requested maps in Israel.
NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
Photo : Add pictures to articles in Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel.
Stubs : See Israel stubs.
Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
Other :
- Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary.

Syria High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: History High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as High-importance).

Western Asia High‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Requested move 26 March 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved Even though I !voted, I'm closing this since the page is already moved and a bot keeps adding the move template. (non-admin closure) Nice4What (talk) 22:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel → United States recognition of Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights –
Wikipedia's policy on article titles clearly states that:

"A good Wikipedia article title has the five following characteristics:

Recognizability – The title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize.
Naturalness – The title is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles. Such a title usually conveys what the subject is actually called in English."

The subject of this article is that the United States government recognized Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights so it should not be just about Donald Trump's proclamation. This article should be like the article about United States recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital meaning that it should provide a background of the decision to recognize the Golan Heights as part of Israel that includes the interactions between the United States and Israel regarding the Golan Heights since Israel's establishment in 1948. Also, I believe it's reasonable to think that visitors of Wikipedia will most likely search for "United States recognition of Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights" instead of "Proclamation on Recognizing the Golan Heights as Part of the State of Israel".

"Precision – The title unambiguously identifies the article's subject and distinguishes it from other subjects.
Conciseness – The title is no longer than necessary to identify the article's subject and distinguish it from other subjects.
Consistency – The title is consistent with the pattern of similar articles' titles."

A similar article's title is: United States recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel so this article's title should be: United States recognition of Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights.

Therefore, I propose renaming this article to United States recognition of Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights. 2600:1700:BBD0:8050:3C78:A0BB:680D:657F (talk) 01:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OPPOSE. I would support a change to "United States recognition of Israel's claim to sovereignty over the Golan Heights". We have to remember that all the other countries don't recognise that Israel has sovereignty, nor that the US has the right to bestow it, and it is unlikely that the issue will ever cease to be contentious. ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ^{♥ Talk♥} 02:22, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@L'Origine du monde: While your proposed title is slightly more accurate, it's just as awkward. Nice4What (talk) 12:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I was the one who renamed the article because the title "United States recognition of Israel's claim to sovereignty over the Golan Heights" is long and sounds awkward. We have a formal name for the proclamation, so I believe it can be best used as the official title. Nice4What (talk) 12:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This article should be renamed in a way to be consistent with United States recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel, since both topics are very closely connected. As for the matter of exact wording when it comes to the new name, we should try and reach a consensus about it. --Sundostund (talk) 13:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A shorter descriptive name (if we prefer a description over the formal) might be United States recognition of the Golan Heights as Israeli.Icewhiz (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I feel like using "as Israeli" is vague and I doubt the US no longer recognizes the Druze-Syrian community there. I think if we have to rename, maybe "United States recognition of the Golan Heights as part of Israel" could work - simple phrasing, very similar to the proclamations title. I still oppose the rename, but I'd note that the scope of the article is written about the proclamation and would have to be completely restructured. Nice4What (talk) 14:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - All Druze in the Golan are Isreali residents and many are citizens (all of them are eligible to become citizens upon request). However we word this - if we go the descriptive route - a shorter title would be better - e.g. 2019 United States proclamation on the Golan Heights .Icewhiz (talk) 14:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - I feel that title isn't descriptive enough... that's why I prefer the title as is 😁. Nice4What (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Consistent with United States recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel I would say United States recognition of the Golan Heights as part of Israel. It might be long but article names should be consistent. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 15:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- As stated above, if a rename was necessary, I'd support this title. Nice4What (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- This title is something which I would be ready to support. To me, it seems as the most logical choice, beside the title which I proposed. --Sundostund (talk) 15:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I think a suitable name might be United States recognition of Israeli sovereignty claim over the Golan Heights. ––Sundostund (talk) 15:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moved Decided to move the page to United States recognition of the Golan Heights as part of Israel as per WP:BOLD and it seems a consensus was reached that the article shouldn't be the official title of the proclamation. Nice4What (talk) 20:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Request for merging United States recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights into this article

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The aforementioned article is about the same subject so I propose merging that article into this article because this article has more content and more sources than that article.2600:1700:BBD0:8050:3C78:A0BB:680D:657F (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I crated the other article and I agree on merging. @2600:1700:BBD0:8050:3C78:A0BB:680D:657F: --Midrashah (talk) 10:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy merge as per article creator's wishes. Nice4What (talk) 12:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Already redirected - WP:BOLDly - diff - as it contained nothing that wasn't here. I support the merge/redirect obviously. Icewhiz (talk) 13:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"deprecated source"

HalfdanRagnarsson, what do you mean by "deprecated source" ? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 04:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Supreme Deliciousness: Please look at WP:RSPSS. The Electronic Intifada is marked down as an unreliable source (ok, deprecated may have been the wrong word); it should be used only when absolutely necessary, and certainly not on sensitive articles that are covered by DS. Also, if you want me to engage in discussion, please ping me next time; otherwise I will obviously be unaware of a discussion going on.

Also, I must add that a single quote "in response" is a very poor reason for inclusion, especially when it's the only source; given that it's an unreliable source, it should certainly never be used in this context. HalfdanRagnarsson (talk) 02:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 November 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Under the paragraph American officials Hezbollah is misspelled as Hizballah Thanks Jrspsb8055 (talk) 04:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Hizballah is an alternative spelling of Hezbollah. The spelling is also the one used in the official proclamation. Liu1126 (talk) 14:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]