Talk:Unification of Nepal

Nepal Top‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I went through and made some edits to this article. There's good information here, but there were several instances in which very biased language was used, which I corrected. Evidently, some people still hold historical grievances against King Shah. I also provided a source for the statement that King Shah cut off the peoples lips and noses when he conquered Kirtipur, since that is an atrocity. I'm just trying to achieve a neutral and factual viewpoint. Bigdan201 (talk) 08:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't what happened be more accurately be described as a creation rather than a unification. Unification implies a preexisting entity, but there simply was no such thing as the Kingdom of Nepal until it was created by conquest. Prior to that what is presently Nepal was a series and collection of small kingdoms that were contiguous and part of the South Asia/Indian/Hindu geo cultural sphere and cannot historically be distinguished from the history of nearby parts of what are today Bihar, Uttarkhand, and Uttar Pradesh in India. Though much of the hill country in today's Nepal (pahar) was not ruled by empires based on the Ganges Plain, today's Terai was definitely ruled by Patilputra and Delhi for much of the Mauryan, Gupta, and Delhi Sultanate/Mughal Empires. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.164.62.134 (talk) 04:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Capital of Nepal

Kathmandu was the capital of Nepal before Shah came along, and he did not make it the capital. See "Cadmendu, the capital of the kingdom of Necbal" in Pratap Malla (Athanasius Kircher, S.J. (1677). China Illustrata. Translated by Dr. Charles D. Van Tuyl from 1677 original Latin edition. (1986). p. 68.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.166.200.85 (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Before Prithivi Narayan Shah's conquest, there was no kingodm of Nepal, the today's Kathmandu valley with three kingdoms Kantipur(Kathmandu), Lalitpur(Patan), and Bhaktapur(Bhadgaon), was known as Nepal and comprised of three separate kingdoms. Until the victory of Kathmandu Nuwakot was the capital of Prithivi Narayan Shah's kingdom and when he occupied the valley he named his kingdom as Nepal and declared Kathmandu as the capital. Shirsakbc (talk) 19:35, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Kingdom of Nepal existed way before Gorkhali conquest in Nepal. The confederation has many city-states, not just Yen (Kathmandu), Yala (Lalitpur) and Khwapa (Bhaktapur). Almost every town Tokha, Thaiba, Lubhu, Thakwaa (Thankot), Khona (Khokana), etc had their own Juju (king) and Laaykoo (palace). The juju don't exist, but Laayko still exists in almost every town. See Nepal#Etymology, Nepal Mandala, Newar language#Name, Nepali language#Name.--थकुराःमा (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Unification of Nepal

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Unification of Nepal's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "nepalarmythree":

From Kingdom of Nepal: "Nepal and Tibetan conflict". Official website of Nepal Army.
From History of Nepal: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2017-02-05.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

Reference named "nepalarmy":

From Thapa: http://nepalarmy.mil.np/history.php?page=two
From Thapa dynasty: "History of the Nepalese Army". nepalarmy.mil.np. Archived from the original on 15 November 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
From Balbhadra Kunwar: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-04-01. Retrieved 2017-04-01.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
From Abhiman Singh Basnet: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2017-03-28.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
From Kingdom of Nepal: https://www.nepalarmy.mil.np/page/history
From Bahadur Shah of Nepal: "Nepal Army". Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2017-03-28.
From Gorkha Kingdom: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2017-02-05.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Battle of Jhunga.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance tags

I believe the Original Research tag can be removed. Not sure about the Neutrality tag. Posting here for discussion. Shisma9 (talk) 03:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]