Talk:USS Sioux City

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / Post-Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Myriad technical problems

The entire LCS program has been dogged by technical issues, some of which were predictable. In mentioning that the Sioux City was decommissioned less than five years after it was commissioned, I’m puzzled why no mention was made of the Navy’s disappointment with the performance, operating cost and relibility of these ships.

216.152.18.132 (talk) 19:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is something that should probably be posted on, and addressed at, the main Talk:Littoral combat ship page. (imo) - wolf 20:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for this particular ship's extremely short lifespan (only four and a half years) needs be added to the article for this particular ship, USS Sioux City, because this ship has the shortest length of service of them all (commissioned 17 November 2018, decommissioned 14 August 2023). There must have been something seriously wrong with this particular ship, because that four and a half year lifespan is possibly the shortest length of service of any US Navy ship in modern history that wasn't sunk or involved in a collision, fire, sabotage, running aground, or other major disaster. I think Wikipedia readers need to know what was wrong with this particular ship that made the Navy decommission it after only four and a half years. Gato63 (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was wrong with this particular ship? Please include a citation from a reliable source. --Dual Freq (talk) 17:44, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]