This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
There is a lot of ship history with USC&GS through NOAA service until Pathfinder's end in 1971. As with several of these ships built during the war there is as much civilian service as USN with NOAA History available. I see one example in which the two are split and cross referenced. I've seen others where service with two organizations are handled on one page. Development on separate pages could be merged into one article and might be easier as far as organization. Combined articles could be split if that is the preference. Standards? Policy? Preferences? Palmeira (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DANFS, in one of its fairly rare lapses, is the origin of the 1929 build date that made no sense with the appearance and other details of the ship. Multiple NOAA and other sources, some added as cites, contain detail on the actual 1941-1942 construction and fitting out of the ship, including photographs. Palmeira (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
