Jump to content

Talk:USS Birmingham (SSN-695)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Hunt for Red October

[edit]
This is not a screen cap from the film, it is not the same angle and not related to the film Hunt for Red October. The submarine in the film does not have a hull number in the same location.

This edit in May 2006 added the bit about SSN-695 appearing in the film. Checking the DVD, there are no numbers visible. Additionally, the film does not thank individual ships, but instead thanks several US Pacific Fleet commanders and Submarine Group Five. These are all west coast units, Birmingham was not a west coast ship. (edit, I stand corrected on this item as Birmingham was stationed in Pearl Harbor in 1991.[1]) USS Gary was the stand in for the FFG in the film and can be seen in one of the shots while the submarine is doing an emergency surface. Garys command history report from 10 July 1989 states they were underway for the filming, off southern California having departed from Long Beach.[2] USS Salt Lake City had VIP's on board relating to the film in March 1989, though that SLC was not in the area during filming in July 1989.[3][4][5] Either way, the submarine in the film could not have been Birmingham. I believe this resulted in confusion with published photo linked with this text. Unfortunately this error has been in wikipedia for so many years that there are a few sources that took that and reprinted it as if it were true. The real submarine was likely in COMSUBGRU 5, and in the vicinity og Long Beach in July 1989. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

USS Houston participated in filming the Hunt for Red October in May/June 1989.[6] --Dual Freq (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on USS Birmingham (SSN-695). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]