Talk:U.S. Army Regimental System

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Linking

Great article, shame we can't link to the sections because of the images in the headers - Way to go! Chaosdruid (talk) 06:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:001-Cav-RegtCOA.svg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:001-Cav-RegtCOA.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per the most recent edition of AR 670-1 and the new DA Pam 670-1, there has been a change to how Soldiers are regimentally affiliated. Based on AR 670-1 and DA Pam 670-1 and current guidance that AR 670-1 has superceded AR 600-82, any Soldier may now regimentally affiliate with any unit to which they can prove assignment, i.e. ERB, orders, etc. This is a change from the old system described in this article, where a combat arms Soldier could affiliate with any regiment within their PMOS regardless of whether they were actually assigned to that regiment, and a CS/CSS Soldier could only affiliate with their whole-corps regiment. If the original author of this article is not available to make the changes, I would be willing to make the updates. I think the only major change needed would be the addition of a new section detailing the change to the policy. Kintrix (talk) 09:05, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3d Brigade, 10th Mountain Division

What is the proper way to refer to the 3d Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division? I see them referred to as the 3d Brigade Combat Team, 36th Infantry Division, and as the 3d Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain (their Facebook page has this.) Anyone know the official way they should be listed? Sg413 (talk) 03:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)sg413[reply]