Talk:Typhoon Noru

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Typhoon Noru article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cambodia Low‑importance

Typhoon Noru is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Southeast Asia: Laos Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Laos (assessed as Low-importance).

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Thailand Mid‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vietnam Mid‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 30 September 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Typhoon Noru (2022). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Page name

I wish to suggest that this page be moved to Typhoon Noru (2022), as it may not become the most prominent typhoon of this name, see Typhoon Noru (2017). An admin would need to delete the existing redirect Typhoon Noru (2022) to make way for this move. Drdpw (talk) 01:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd give this some time to wait and see. I do agree the page was made under the wrong title, but it is well on its way to gain PRIMARYTOPIC considering how the Philippines massively underestimated the forecast strength of the storm due to its unprecedented intensification, which may have disastrous consequences. Chlod (say hi!) 01:29, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 September 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Noru → Typhoon Noru (2022) – To not be confused with Typhoon Noru (2017) SeanJ 2007 (talk) 00:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The page has the {{about}} template at the top to clear any confusion. As for the whole "retirement before WP:PRIMARYTOPIC" thing, Noru is well on its way to being retired, and clears the "damages" bar set by the PAGASA (minimum of ₱1 billion). It's expected that they'll send in a request for retirement to the Typhoon Committee eventually. We're not an RSMC, we're Wikipedia, and WP:COMMONNAME takes priority over added bureaucracy from weak local consensus. Might also be worth mentioning that Noru 2017 primarily hit Japan, which doesn't actually use names given by the JMA (and instead uses a number identifier, in this case: 平成29年台風第5号). Chlod (say hi!) 01:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose. This is clearly a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC This is the topic to which the term should lead, serving as the title of (or a redirect to) the relevant article. (e.g Hurricane Ida Hurricane Ida (2009)). HurricaneEdgar 05:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose. Noru's 2022 incarnation has already supplanted its 2017 iteration in terms of notability and notoriety. This is definitely a case of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC now for its impacts in the Philippines and Vietnam. Vida0007 (talk) 05:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I agree with 2022's Noru being a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC due to the deaths and damage it caused. Despite, 2017's Noru was known for being the second-longest-lasting tropical cyclone in the northwest Pacific Ocean, 2022's Noru should be the lead article as it was the most notorious storm of the three other storms. Layah50♪ (喋ってください!) 05:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Current events, WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, WikiProject Weather, and WikiProject Vietnam have been notified of this discussion. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 07:43, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support no PRIMARY by long-term significance.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - 2022's Noru is clearly the primary topic. 🇺🇦 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 10:43, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This year's Noru is definitely a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC because of the havoc that it created. Noru might get retired as well. This system is very significant and should be the primary topic. FilbertKaiserRoll (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above as WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 14:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support no PRIMARY by long-term significance. Partyfrittata (talk) 10:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose 2017's Noru only lived very long whilst this year's Noru was a category 5 typhoon that killed 22 people and is the primary topic. RandomInfinity17 (talk) 23:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Undefined ref

@Bsslover371: please fill in a source for the ":Cambodia" ref you added last year. -- Fyrael (talk) 19:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]