Talk:Turf War (The Office)

Turf War (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Turf War (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 8) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 17, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
November 7, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by The Office task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Turf War (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 01:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will begin reviewing this article as soon as I get a chance!--Dom497 (talk) 01:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Quality of the article is good.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Everything looks good for this section of the review.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Everything looks good here.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
All statements have reliable sources.

C. No original research:
No original research found within the article.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
All major aspects of the topic have been covered.

B. Focused:
Information remains focused to the article topic.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
No bias found.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
~~There are no edit wars but the info within the article is changing on a daily basis. I will wait for a few days to see what happens, then come to a conclusion for this section.~~ Article is stable enough.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Image licenses look good.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Picture is appropriate and has a good caption.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 00:17, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]