Talk:Tornado over Kansas/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 02:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 02:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

 

---

Observations

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

• Prose is good and clear; article follows Manual of Style.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

• References directly address the painting. Reference 2 is an excellent introduction to this artist and his work.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

• A good blend of history, appreciation and criticism of this painting.

1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

• NPOV is preserved.

1. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

• Article shows no history of edit warring.

1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

• Image = public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.

1. Overall:

• A balanced presentation of this work of art (and of this artist whom many Kansas peoples were critical of).       --Whiteguru (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

 

 Passed