This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– If people are searching for Tom Clark, it's much easier to find which one based on date of birth- there will be no confusion between a person born in 1924 and one born in 2001. On the other hand, many readers will not know whether the person they're looking for played for Surrey or Sussex. So this move would make it much easier for readers, especially casual readers, to find the article they are looking for. And we often disambiguate by year of birth, by county they played for doesn't seem like a natural dismabiguation to me, as it requires much greater subject knowledge. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:NCPDAB "Years of birth and death are not normally used as disambiguators (readers are more likely to be seeking this information than to already know it)". If you fast-forward ten years from now, will people looking for the Sussex cricketer know that he was born in 2001? Or was it a year or two either side of that? Same for the Surrey cricketer - I doubt people could guess at his decade of birth, let alone the year, but might have a better idea which club he played for. LugnutsFire Walk with Me16:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I respectfully disagree. If you start typing Tom Clark, and see two people listed with years of birth 77 years apart, I would know which one I wanted. But if I see Surrey and Sussex, it requires a lot more knowledge on the players to know which one you want. We shouldn't assume everyone knows what clubs players play for- after all, that's the sort of information a reader may be looking for. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Personally in a situation like this I prefer a year of birth disambiguator as Joseph2302 has suggested. I appreciate this is a bit crystal ball-ey, but the current player could well move to another side, or be selected for the Hundred in the near future, and so the current disambiguator could prove confusing. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
