Talk:Toli Masjid

Toli Masjid was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 3, 2023). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

India: Andhra Pradesh / History / Hyderabad Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hyderabad (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam: Mosques Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Mosques task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Toli Masjid/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Aintabli (talk · contribs) 12:34, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Length would not normally be a factor in GAs, but this article is too underdeveloped in my honest opinion. There are one or two sentence-long sections. Sections crucial for such articles, such as Toli Masjid#Interior, are not fleshed out enough. Much of the sources come from news sites. I would expect some more variety, especially since sources on this mosque do not appear to be hard to find. I believe this list of good articles on relevant topics could be a good reference for a future nomination. If the last two sections cannot be expanded enough, they would have to be merged with other sections, otherwise this goes against MOS:BODY, and more from the already used sources could be included in the article, specifically this. I suggest creating a Bibliography or Sources section, so that each page could be separately cited, instead of repeatedly using the same references which include ranges of pages. Aintabli (talk) 12:34, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]