Jump to content

Talk:Tokyo Skytree

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

13 elevators?

[edit]

Why has the Tokyo Sky Tree 13 elevators? --84.61.139.62 (talk) 08:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

[edit]

Whomever selected THAT photo for the main image - um - seriously?? The humans in the foreground give it a sense of scale that make the building look about 100 feet tall. Is this honestly the best you can do? The article says this is the tallest tower in the world now. I was led to the article by a "did you know" on the main page to that effect. The image gives no impression of that, in fact, it conveys a false impression that it is much smaller than it actually is. Please fix or do somefink.68.144.172.8 (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I came to say the same thing; Tokyo Sky Tree1.jpg presents an illusion that tremendously diminishes the building's perceived size.   — C M B J   22:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The currently selected image is worse. The tower itself is hard to make out from the background clutter. Given the choice between a clear image that makes it look big versus an image that isn't clear at all, I'd prefer the clear image. I'm not opposed to a better image being used, but it has to actually be better, not worse. TechnoSymbiosis (talk) 08:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The fact we've even managed to make the second tallest building in the world legitimately look [Edit: 210 meters tall] is so asinine that it's almost humorous. Background clutter pales in comparison.   — C M B J   04:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would think the main purpose of the image is to show what the tower looks like first and foremost, with its comparative size as a secondary goal. Surely with all the media coverage we can find a free image somewhere that shows both? TechnoSymbiosis (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Size is a primary concern when a structure's foremost claim to fame is its unique height. The only way I personally see the value of design surpassing that of "tallest X in the world" would be if it were something radically different than anything the world had ever seen before: something immediately captivating, of immense artistic value, or with outrageous social connotations. I'm sure that we can procure a better image on Flickr or at some point in the near future, but an Alice in Wonderland shot should be an absolute last resort for an article meeting this description.   — C M B J   05:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, the contrast between the tower and the buildings next to it are enough to illustrate the height. I certainly prefer it to the previous replacement--a grey tower against a backdrop of grey buildings is just too messy. But if it'd make things better in any way, what about a crop of this image on Flickr? wctaiwan (talk) 06:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC) Some more here, such as [1]. wctaiwan (talk) 06:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's the problem though; it really doesn't contrast well — at least not from the angles we're seeing. When you compare this with this, it's safe to say that the image on Flickr is better, but it's still wildly inaccurate, even when scaling against (what appears to possibly be) the exact same building side-by-side.   — C M B J   06:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was surprised by the "asinine" and "Alice in Wonderland" comments above, and feel that the current image showing the tower against the sky is way better than the earlier aerial view used in which the tower merged into the cityscape background. Another problem with the aerial view image is that it shows the tower while it was still under construction with the cranes on top, so it is visually out-of-date. If someone can upload a better image to Commons or find something on Flickr, then fine, but it seems the best we have right now. --DAJF (talk) 06:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Suum cuique pulchrum est, but those descriptors weren't intended as hyperboles. The tower demonstrably appears to be one-third of its real height in the current image, which is to say the same as the difference between Burj Khalifa and Trump Tower. It's a monumental discrepancy.   — C M B J   07:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 02:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Tokyo Sky Tree → Tokyo Skytree – While English-language press coverage seems divided between "Sky Tree" and "Skytree", all official publicity and on-site signage uses the official rendering and registered trademark "Tokyo Skytree". (See Official English website) --DAJF (talk) 11:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. "TOKYO SKYTREE" is a registered trade mark and not a common English name.[2] So if we need to change the title from "Tokyo Sky Tree", it should be "TOKYO SKYTREE" not "Tokyo Skytree". It may be resolved to mention "it is trade marked as "TOKYO SKYTREE" in the lede. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 11:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment on comment: Doing so would be a clear violation of WP:MOSTM, which states that article titles must use standard English capitalization and formatting. 86.21.250.191 (talk) 19:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are right. I commented a bit hasty without consulting the guideline. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 11:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.designbuild-network.com/projects/tokyo-sky-tree/
    Triggered by \bdesignbuild-network\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tower vs building vs skyscraper

[edit]

See discussion at Talk:Tower#Tower vs building vs skyscraper jnestorius(talk) 17:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AM-Broadcasting from Tokyo Skytree?

[edit]

Is Tokyo Skytree really used for AM-broadcasting? If yes, which kind of antenna is used — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.228.0.33 (talk) 20:57, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So how did it work?

[edit]

The original and primary purpose was for better broadcasting coverage vs the Tokyo Tower. So, how did this work out? Are they able to cover the entire Greater Tokyo area with the primary broadcaster? B137 (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tokyo Skytree. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tokyo Skytree. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Tokyo Skytree. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The file TOKYO SKYTREE logo.svg on Wikimedia Commons has been nominated for deletion. View and participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 21:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it called sky tree?

[edit]

Nothing, just that RelyingRaven (talk) 07:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See section of article headed "Naming and height". Ity tells you there. Cheers IdreamofJeanie (talk) 09:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect needed

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_skytree should redirect here. 2600:1700:D0A0:21B0:5492:DBAA:58D1:5E76 (talk) 03:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Floor count"

[edit]

I removed a claim of "29 floors about ground, cited to a foreign "skyscraper" page: http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=36514%7Cpublisher=Skyscraper Source Media|access-date=14 November 2016|archive-date=23 May 2007. The "official" website shows 6 floors labelled from B1F to 5F (using the American system), plus five more levels identified by heights in metres. The 29, or 32 figures are probably derived from Yahoo answer type sites, asking "how many skyscraper floors would it correspond to", which is ill-defined trivia. Imaginatorium (talk) 04:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oddly-phrased statement in article introduction

[edit]

The article claims that "It is also the first tallest freestanding tower in both OECD and G7," which is am ambiguous statement. It definitely is not the first tallest freestanding tower in G7 -- CN Tower predates it in that category. Rob Kelk 00:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tokyo_Skytree&oldid=1259637648"