Jump to content

Talk:Togo at the 2018 Winter Olympics/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 01:21, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TheDragonFire (talk · contribs) 09:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    Some minor issues with grammar (fixed by 1, 2).
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    Some minor issues with duplicate references and unspecific reference titles (fixed by 1).
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    The article is quite short, but since it covers a very limited subject matter this seems appropriate.
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    The caption for the photo of Mathilde-Amivi Petitjean is sparse, perhaps we could clarify where it is from (fixed by 1).
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


TheDragonFire (talk) 11:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]