A fact from Titania McGrath appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 April 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that a columnist for the British Internet magazine Spiked created the fictional Twitter user Titania McGrath in order to mock contemporary "woke culture"?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
I just found out that the page had previously been deleted through consensus, but I just want to clarify why I made the page. Firstly, because the Telegraph has published an in-depth article about it as well as multiple articles by The Times, plus review articles by The Observer and the Evening Standard. I saw one of the arguments for deletion had been that it's "too soon," which it certainly was at the time, I agree, but now i think is the time to write that article. MikeOwendiscuss21:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This page should not be speedily deleted because... it is not substantially identical to the previous version and now contains mutiple references to reliable secondary sources with in depth coverage of the subject. The original article was WP:TOOSOON but this one is not. --Jonathan A Jones (talk) 10:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I endorse the re-creation. There's been enough coverage (or at least a presumption of enough coverage - from releasing a book) that a notability discussion should be re-visited before the article is deleted. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My congratulations to whoever included a Godfrey Elfwick column as a source. Humor aside, was it ever confirmed if Elfwick and McGrath are written by the same person? McGrath appeared around the time the Elfwick account was shut down on Twitter. 73.149.246.232 (talk) 06:19, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}