Talk:Tim Kevan
 | This article was nominated for deletion on October 1 2006. The result of the discussion was Delete. No notability established.. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
History restored
[edit]I've just now undeleted the article's old history. The article was deleted by AFD for non notability. The new page is based on totally new claims of notability, and thus is far from a recreation. I would say that if someone feels that this new page fails notability, a new AFD is required. I have restored the history from the older version. This will allow for anyone to incorporate elements from the old page into the new. IMHO, if the new page meets notability requirements, it'll still meet them if elements of the older, non-notable page are added. I do not take a strong position myself as to whether the new page does or does not meet notability requirements. - TexasAndroid (talk) 14:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Proposed Deletion
[edit]- Keep. Notability is surely demonstrated by the books published by a serious publisher (Bloomsbury), and reviewed by serious publications such as The Times. ---Asteuartw (talk) 17:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)