This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
One of the users here said that the title was changed from "tickle fetishism" to "tickle games" because "it is too specific to classify typical tickling as a fetish".
The title doesn't seem to be totally appropriate to fully capture all interests in tickling, especially with the info provided within the article itself. "Tickle fetishism" seemed to be more appropriate to capture all of the interest therein.
A "fetish" is a sexual arousal to a physical object or a situation/activity. So from this definition, and from the fact that tickling is capable of providing sexual arousal, wouldn't that confirm that tickling be considered a fetish?
Not everyone who has the interest is focused on it being a thing specifically for endurance or amusement...
Though tickling is used for games, I don't believe the entire article should be named for the sake of just that one aspect of the interest. Tickling for the purpose of games are just a piece of the whole. The article lists that tickling can be used as a means of foreplay, bonding experiences, courting rituals, etc...all interests that define other lifestyle pursuits, having tickling for sexual reasons and tickling for fun. A game has a nature of being spontaneous and competitive and objective based.
As a person who's actively a tickle enthusiast for years, I strongly suggest the name be put back to "Tickle Fetishism"... Once again "Tickling Games" does not cover all basis for tickling.
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Tickling fetishism's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
From Knismesis and gargalesis: Harris, Christine R. (1999): The mystery of ticklish laughter. American Scientist, July–August v87 i4 p344(8).
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡16:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Foottickling.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Foottickling.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
Consensual tickling can be regarded as a form of physical intimacy as it involves the touching of one person's body by another. It could serve as a bonding experience between friends, or a simple act of familiarity and trust. Between adults, it sometimes functions as an outlet for sexual energy, with erotic games, foreplay and sex being the primary methods of doing such.
Some people take part in tickling games or contests which test their endurance to being tickled, for amusement, erotic pleasure, or other reasons. These games may involve some form of physical restraint of the person to be tickled to prevent them protecting the ticklish spots or otherwise interfering with the game. Common positions for tickling are the over-arm tie, the hogtie, spread-eagle, with the person being tied up, cuffed or in stocks. The restraints may be left loose to increase the amount of possible movement, but short of the person being able to protect the ticklish spots. On the other hand, some participants prefer very tight bondage. The tied person may also be blindfolded to increase the anxiety and surprise element.
The objective of such games is to generate uncontrollable writhing, struggling, laughing and vocalizations etc., from the person being tickled, while the person tries to control such reactions, without the ability to physically defend the ticklish spots.
I've tried to change the name and I've gotten error messages about my user access level, which is fair enough. I think, though, the name of this article should be changed. Yes, sexual activity should be consensual. However, there is no page specifically addressing the tickle fetish itself, while there is a page about tickling, which describes nonsexual games involving tickling (meaning they are not necessary here), and tickle torture, discussing nonconsensual instances.
The article also addresses many general BDSM topics in unsourced, roundabout ways (eg, things like "forms of bondage include x y z positions" or info on the concept of safewording- far more relevant to articles specifically covering bondage) to cover the sexual aspects that consensual tickling could have. If the page is solely dedicated to the fetish itself, it could go more in detail especially on its history, cultural prevalence, etc., and not just "here are the instances in which consensual tickling could potentially take place see also: tickling". Micahtchi (talk) 03:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
