Talk:Threat Level Midnight

Threat Level Midnight has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 28, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Television: Episode coverage / The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by The Office task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Threat Level Midnight/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 00:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know that the film isn't shown in its entirety, but maybe you should add in another graph to plot noting some of the highlights of the movie. "Throughout the episode, portions of the movie are seen, including...X"
How's it look now?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
On the same token, I don't necessarily see the value of listing the credits in the plot section, because the list of guest actors and the roles they play really belong more in a dedicated section along the lines of "casting" in the Production section.
Removed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You should note Carrel's departure in the production section, as it makes a little smoother reading. It would explain why they produced an entire episode on a whim from him, and also a lot of the critical response which touches on it.
Added.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There are often pop culture references sections in Office articles. I think there were enough such references in the movie that they might be worth adding.
Added.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Were there any deleted scenes included on the DVD release?
They just included a longer version of the movie.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Darryl's opinion on portraying a black president before was elected Obama. " -- I think this needs to be reworded.
Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dab links tool returns no results. All external links appear to be working. I found only one duplicate link which I removed. I see no problems with article neutrality or stability. Images appear to be properly licensed.

Placing the article on hold pending fixes. —Ed!^(talk) 01:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Thanks for the review. How does it look now?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! Passing GA now. —Ed!^(talk) 10:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]