This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: New enough and long enough. No close paraphrasing spotted. Hook fact is cited to a reliable source. However, as I noted above, there are far too many sections for the length of this article, and the text itself is very jarring. Recommend a bit of polish. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. It is better - still feels like there are a few too many sections, which could cause weight issues (for instance, having three sections for controversies) - but the issue is not as bad. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- There are far too many sections; I've thus tagged the article. Many of the paragraphs read like WP:PROSELINE as well.
New enough and long enough. No close paraphrasing spotted. Hook fact is cited to a reliable source. However, as I noted above, there are far too many sections for the length of this article, and the text itself is very jarring. Recommend a bit of polish. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Thank you. It is better - still feels like there are a few too many sections, which could cause weight issues (for instance, having three sections for controversies) - but the issue is not as bad. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)