Talk:The Weinstein Company/Archives/2014
This is an archive of past discussions about The Weinstein Company. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Movie List
Instead of two lists, I think there should be one list, with only films that have been released currently. Thus, I am removing all movies not released or movies that have an official release date (such as Doogal, etc.), and putting the films into one centralized list. Casey14 00:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC) What about control? the joy division movie...please make it available in california preferably the bay area! i dont want to have to wait to own it on dvd.
Non Weinstein Films
The Brother's Grimm and Proof are both not Weintein Films. Proof can be found on the Miramax website and The Brother's Grimm, like The Great Raid, was one of the last of Disney's Dimension projects. You can see since all three films did poorly in the box office and got barely any marketing support. Casey14 00:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Location
Where is the headquarter? And do they have their own studios? --Stilfehler 17:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Weinsteins and foreign films
What happened to the paragraph about this subject? Was it not NPOV? Why deleting it? —Gh87 21:47, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Genius Products
I believe that something should be mentioned within this entry regarding the fact that The Weinstein Company now owns Genius Products.
- It's more of a joint venture. Read more about it here. --
(
trogga)
01:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Blockbuster Agreement
Something should be added about this ridiculous new agreement they have made with Blockbuster. Rotinhellorg
- After reading their respective articles, I suspect Blockbuster was having trouble competing with Netflix so they tried to pull a fast one in the Fall of 2006 by eliminating a direct source of DVD titles, TWC.[1] I just heard about it and popped by to see if I was going to miss out on any movies worth seeing because of this ridiculous monopolistic arrangement made with Blockbuster. Fortunately most of the films listed are low budget or just plain strange (yes, my POV) so IMHO Netflix has little to fear from this arrangement. And, yes, in case it wasn't plain, I am a current Netflix subscriber. JimScott (talk) 15:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
independence
has anyone checked the factual backings of The Weinstein Company's claim to independence? as it's currently set are they pretty much owned by Dimension/MGM"sony" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Markthemac (talk • contribs) 07:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC).
- First of all, MGM does not own TWC; it just distributes some of their films. Secondly, Dimension is actually a subsidiary/sublabel of TWC. --
(
trogga)
07:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)- That is all that needed to be said. Weinstein is independent, and it owns Dimension. MGM just distributes its films. Casey14 15:36, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Can anyone explain why the Halloween 2 DVD is distributed by Sony if MGM/Sony stopped their distribution of Weinstein Films in late 2008 just before Zack & Miri? ChesterG (talk) 14:58, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Weinstein company logo.png
Image:Weinstein company logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Weinstein methods
The Weinsteins (Miramax and the Weinstein Company) have a well-known reputation for mangling foreign films and film adaptations, chopping and changing films severely after test-screenings and keeping films in development- and post-production hell. For examples of how generally accepted this view is, see [here], [here] and [here]. The same fate seems to have befallen Killshot at their hands.
Does anyone want to attempt to put this point in a neutral way? Centrepull (talk) 06:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Loss of my rights???
The "Ex" was a great movie... Funny thing happened while I'm watching the movie. At the 20 minute mark, what do I see? Me on the stand testifying at my parent’s murder trial on the TV while Amanda is on the couch. I was curious if the producers were ever going to contact me to let me know I was appearing in a movie without my knowledge? Doing some research, the movie was allowed to use the footage because it appeared on CNN's Nancy Grace and was televised live on CNN. I just wanted to complain...
Matthew Johnson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.229.177.210 (talk) 20:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
I think most images/film created by the US Government is automatically in the Public Domain, so I'd assume court case footage falls under this also, and therefore can be used without your permission for any purpose. Jacobitten (talk) 10:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Did they have anything to do with "The Hammer"?
I feel like I remember hearing Adam Carolla complaining that due to 'Hollywood Accounting' by the Weinstein brothers he receives nothing for the DVD sales on his movie "The Hammer". Were they involved in this movie? I don't see it listed on this page. Jacobitten (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Redirect
I see some exclusionists managed to again merge/redirect independent branding. Does anyone know how long the old revisions will remain available to the general public looking for specific information? Lostinlodos (talk) 20:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
The Intouchables in China
I read that the studio bought the rights for USA, Scandinavia and China. But I still don't find any information on a China release. Any news ? Late release, canceled ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loup Solitaire 81 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)