Talk:The Revenge of Heaven

The author would welcome @Kj cheetham:'s kind willingness to elaborate on why in his view the article neither meets the Wiki professional standard nor at least as a fairly complete treatment of the subject can be found very useful to readers. In this way User:Kj cheetham may become able to contribute to improving the standard of the article and at the same time reveal the criteria of his judgment. --Klaaschwotzer (talk) 11:31, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Klaaschwotzer, I'm not sure I understand your question. I have not said the article doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards, in fact rating it as "B" is the highest I ever give to an article. If you're interesting in promoting the article to "GA", please see WP:GAN as that is not something I'm involved with. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kj cheetham:: Have you ever read the book? Otherwise you are not able to compare the article with the books contents. Otherwise you can not jugde at all. --Klaaschwotzer (talk) 17:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Klaaschwotzer: I'm still unclear what you're asking of me. The next classification above "B" is "GA", which I personally am not able to grant because I'm not a GA reviewer and there is a formal process for nominating articles to become GA (WP:GAN). You may wish to discuss it at the WP:BOOKS project? -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:03, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article has serious POV problems

This article does not appear to be consistent with Wikipedia's standards. It is clearly intended to advance the author's own analysis of the subject, rather than offering an NPOV summary of the existing perspectives. (I'm not saying it's not convincing, but that it argues a position rather than summarizing existing perspectives.) It needs to be rewritten or at least flagged for POV problems at the top. I don't know how to request for it to be flagged. 76.119.100.142 (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]