Talk:The Pew Charitable Trusts

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge Pew Research Center into this article?

If anyone's out there, let's vote. --RobbyPrather 00:51, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, don't merge... this is important but it's a division that should be seen by interested readers in its own right, not as a part of the trust... which, honestly few probably care about. I think this article is more important even though it is a natural sub-article. So give it a section in the trust article. gren グレン 22:22, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No. don't merge the PRC into the Trusts article. The Research Center article has the potential to list various surveys, etc, that would better serve wikipedia by being on that article. And, while I'm at it, expand both. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 06:16, 2 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]

No. Pew Research is an independent organization, not technically a subsidiary, though de facto. Further, Pew Research is the only arm of Pew's advocacy empire which even claims to be non-advocacy (despite failing at this), and so deserves special treatment. --76.209.59.227 06:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. Especially after they released their 'study' today. http://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf 69.64.227.134 00:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Liberal"?

The one source cited that PCT was an Opinion/Editorial Piece by Martin Wooster, whose opinion appears to be that major philanthropic trusts are mostly "liberal." I searched for a non-obviously-biased opinion upon this, and was unable to find anything. Anyone have any other sources? Safety Cap 21:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PCT heavily underwrite National Public Radio, an organization often thought of as biased toward the liberal agenda. I see this mentioned nowhere in the wiki entry, but I find it important in a reader's perception of the Trust. Equally important - and less well known - would be the PCT's underwriting of perceived conservative media and causes. Perhaps someone could research and include this information? Virga.flame (talk) 03:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whitewash of pro-felon policies

Someone tried to put the well-documented failure of Pew's agenda in CT into the memory hole. Sorry folks, we listened to this crowd and three of my neighbors are now dead. Deal with the facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.141.78 (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing self aggrandising letter by Pew CEO at the foot of the article

Removed due to blatant self serving opinion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Furrybarry (talk • contribs) 18:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removed this -- it was just at the end of article

Corrections &Amplifications

UNDER FEDERAL tax law, the Pew Charitable Trusts will be permitted to spend as much as 5%
of the organization's annual budget on lobbying activities after it converts to a public
charity. An article Thursday incorrectly gave the figure as 20%. (WSJ Nov. 10, 2003)

Jonverve (talk) 20:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Pew Charitable Trusts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140209135628/http://www.pewtrusts.org/default.aspx to http://www.pewtrusts.org/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]