Talk:The Kapil Sharma Show

The Kapil Sharma Show was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 9, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 17 August 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Copy-edited version reverted

@Miniapolis: Your copy-edited version (the cast section) has been reverted back by an IP. I restored it once but the IP has again changed it.- Managerarc™^talk 15:26, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't roll all the way back to the copyedited version because there was a constructive edit by another user in between. I pinged article creator Mr. Smart LION and semi-protected the article for two weeks. All the best, Miniapolis 17:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Kapil Sharma Show/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Numerounovedant (talk · contribs) 07:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Look

Just after a quick glance, i am looking at an instant fail:

The covereage is not wide enough, lacks many imposrant details, and sections.
The lead itself is nowhere near GA standard
No references in parts.
Too many bare URLs
Unreliable sources.

I will wait for the nominator to go through he comments, but this looks like a very premature nomination. NumerounovedantTalk 07:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The covereage is not wide enough, lacks many imposrant details, and sections.

Just take a look at some of the TV show GA. They are of the same length as that of this article. To name a few are: Beat the Chefs, Family Trade and It Takes a Church.

Citing other articles is not a valid argument while discussing reviews.

The lead itself is nowhere near GA standard

As for the lead of the article, I would give the same explanation as given above for the coverage.

Same.

No references in parts.

Please tell which parts of the article need references. In my view, article has enough references.

The writer, director, production, distribution houses, runtime, picture formats are nowhere substantiated.

Too many bare URLs

Filled.

Unreliable sources.

Removed.

What makes India.com, an RS?

Further comments are welcome. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 11:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No pretext provided for Comedy Knights to viewers unfamiliar with teh topic.

Three reviews which are largely negative don't make up for a comprehensive section.

The production does not talk about any filming/writing details.

The mention of most of the technical aspects mentioned in teh info box are largely missing.

Also, over linking is largely persisting problem. Next time, try to ping me after leaving comments. NumerounovedantTalk 13:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to say, but IMO this article is nowhere near the standard of GA, and needs a considerable amount of work. I suggest a PR for the suggestions as this is not the platform for it. Thank you for co operating. I will now fail the article. NumerounovedantTalk 03:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Orphaned references in The Kapil Sharma Show

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of The Kapil Sharma Show's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "DNA":

From Shah Rukh Khan: Ray, Arnab (11 November 2012). "When Shah Rukh Khan lost his groove". Daily News and Analysis. Retrieved 26 January 2013.
From Rock On 2: Joginder Tuteja (November 3, 2016). "Farhan Akhtar's 'Rock On 2' has this in common with 'Tanu Weds Manu Returns'". Daily News and Analysis. Retrieved November 6, 2016.
From Comedy Nights with Kapil: "SRK and Deepika make an entrance on Comedy Nights as they promote Chennai Express... on a scooter". Dailymail.co.uk. 2013-07-03. Retrieved 2014-01-22.
From Daisy Shah: Will Salman Khan's 'Jai Ho' girl Daisy Shah make it big in Bollywood? – Entertainment – DNA
From Bewakoofiyaan: "Film Review: Bewakoofiyaan plays it too safe to rise above the ordinary". Tushar Johsi. Daily News and Analysis. 14 March 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of Season2 and Season3

There is nothing like Season 3 of Kapil Sharma. What here mentioned as Season 3 is the continuation of Season 2 and follows the same format and only the environment is same.

Here is from the official app: https://www.sonyliv.com/shows/The-Kapil-Sharma-Show-1700000083 Vivaanmathur (talk) 09:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes overviews

In episodes overview changes the titles as season episodes overview and make episodes list season wise 103.251.226.135 (talk) 07:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]