This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
The "Criticism" section used to say that Stross's "High Frontier, Redux" essay was relevant somehow. It is not relevant, because O'Neill's "High Frontier" is about colonizing the solar system and Stross's "High Frontier" is about interstellar travel. It's ugly to leave a marker in there saying that another piece of work is irrelevant, but if I remove the marker, there's a good chance that the fact that Stross's article is not a criticism of O'Neill's work will be forgotten and someone will re-insert it as a criticism. Suggestions are welcome.
TimothyFreeman (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]