This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Hi User:Styyx Thanks for tagging this page for over-quotation. I am relatively new and have edited the page in an attempt to address that issue. Can you please tell me the procedure for requesting evaluation to see if the over-quotation issue has been fixed. Thanks Labbrla (talk) 21:19, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Labbrla. There isn't really a formal procedure to follow, though there is a "When to remove" section at Help:Maintenance template removal. If the issue described in the tag is obviously fixed, you can remove it yourself (e.g. after adding a source to an article tagged as unsourced). If you have doubts, the best thing to do is to contact the user who placed the tag. Should they not respond, you can post a message at the Teahouse or help desk.
Looking at this article, I can see that the over-quotation issue is fixed, so I've removed the tag. It's quite a good section that came out. As a general thing, if you wonder how a specific section should be written, you can take a look at featured articles (or good articles) with a similar subject, which will likely help you guide on writing the section you want. ~StyyxTalk?11:40, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
