Talk:The Catch II/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 22:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 06:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, @Gonzo fan2007: My senior in GA reviews and articles! This will be my first sports related GA review, but I'm sure we can get the article passed. BigChrisKenney (talk) 06:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Initial assesment
[edit]Intro
[edit]Good!
Background
[edit]"San Francisco won 6 out of their last 8 games, although it was not enough to overcome the Atlanta Falcons, who won the NFC West."
- If you take out the appositive, the sentence reads -San Francisco who won the NFC West. A rephrase such as; "San Franciso won 6 out of their last 8 games, but lost the NFC West to the Atlanta Falcons." Or something similar might be better.
- Reworded. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Game summary
[edit]First half
[edit]Made some edits you may wish to review.
- Looks good! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Second half
[edit]Made some edits you may wish to review.
- Looks good! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
The play
[edit]Made some edits you may wish to review.
- Looks good! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
End of the game
[edit]Good!
Box score
[edit]Good!
Analysis
[edit]Good!
Officiating
[edit]Good!
Owen's struggles
[edit]"Owens, on his performance up to this point, after the game described it thus: "I let the team down. I was horrible"."
- This sentence seems to be a bit tricky. I would suggest "After the game, Owens commented on his performance before the historic catch saying: "I let the team down. I was horrible". Or something similar.
- Reworded. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Aftermath
[edit]Good!
Replay rule change
[edit]I made some edits you may wish to review.
- Looks good! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Legacy
[edit]Good!
Perhaps adding The Catch III to the List of nicknamed NFL games and plays would be worthwile, especially since it is sourced [39].
- Added. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:22, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]All appear to be pertinent and of acceptable quality.
Images
[edit]All are in the public domain.
I will await your review of my comments and edits before posting a final assesment. BigChrisKenney (talk) 07:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks BigChrisKenney, all comments addressed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Final Assessment
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (references):
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- c (OR):
- d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
- b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Pass/Fail:
I've checked your changes and all looks above board! Congratulations on another GA! BigChrisKenney (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2025 (UTC)