This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Boat Race 2011 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
A fact from The Boat Race 2011 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 August 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the proportion of rowers at the 2011 Boat Race who were British was the highest for a decade?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames
The prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct
Yes
1 b)
It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
Yes
2 a)
It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
Yes
2 b)
It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
Yes
2 c)
It contains no original research
Yes
3 a)
It addresses the main aspects of the topic
Yes
3 b)
It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
Yes
4
It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
Yes
5
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
Yes
6 a)
Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
Yes
6 b)
Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
50%
See point 4 below for why
Overall
Overall Yes/No
Suggestions/Comments from NickGibson3900:
Do you have a ref for the sentence "The first Women's Boat Race took place in 1927, but did not become an annual fixture until the 1960s." If not it should be removed because it could be considered as incorrect because their is no prove.
The sentence "At Hammersmith Bridge, Oxford cox called "2003" to invoke memories of the narrowest margin of victory in the history of the event in the 2003 race." as a few problems. They are:
Do you have a picture of the 2011 race? Do you need to point out George Nash. Could you say "The Cambridge team in the 2013 race" or something along those lines.
No, no decent picture of 2011. Nash is the only rower with a free-to-use picture, and it isn't clear if that photo was of the Boat Race or just practice, hence the current caption. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
