Talk:Tetraquark

Comments

This page has been redirected to exotic meson because there is a more detailed description there. The candidate states earlier described here do not appear in the 2004 Reviews of Particle Properties, and are therefore unconfirmed. The material here has consequently not been merged into the page on exotic mesons. Bambaiah 07:09, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

"dimeson"?

I notice that dibaryon is about a hexaquark particle of the same kind of configuration as a baryon doubled... and not about a two-baryon composite particle. dimeson would seem to be the equivalent term form this 4-quark particle of the same kind of configuration as a meson doubled... but "dimeson" seems to be about composite particles composed of two mesons? Seems like inconsistent terminology? -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

diquark-antidiquark

According to X(3872) article, one tetraquark configuration is the diquark-antidiquark configuration, but statements about Z(4430) seem to say it is a doubled-up meson? -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 00:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rename the article to bimeson please. Hcobb (talk) 02:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tetraquark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add

{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20040401115040/http://www.kek.jp:80/press/2003/belle4e.html to http://www.kek.jp/press/2003/belle4e.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

qqQQ discovery confirmed?

Not making the edit as I am by no means an expert on this subject, but in July 2021 CERN reported the discovery of the T_cc+, which contains ccud. I think this means that the sentence in "History and discoveries" that reads "The existence and stability of tetraquark states with the qqQQ (or qqQQ) have been discussed by theoretical physicists for a long time, however these are yet to be reported by experiments" should either be removed or updated, right? Tpth (talk) 03:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discoveries on July 5th 2022

CERN announced discovery of "first-ever pair of tetraquarks" here. Should it be added to the article? ElfDecker (talk) 08:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]