Talk:Ten no Hate Made – Poland Hishi/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Piotrus (talk · contribs) 14:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs) 01:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'll take this one. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Checklist
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- No issues here
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- No extraneous material
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- No issues with stability
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Images are appropriately licensed as far as I can tell. Effort has been made to ensure illustration.
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]- Not strictly a requirement, but the plot summary is a little brief: can it be beefed up a little?
- I appreciate you are working within the limitations of the source material, but a few summary sentences are vague: "related to other titles by Ikeda"; how?
- Similarly, the Japanese publication history; the first of those is a newspaper, and the rest publishing houses, yes? So I presume it was serialized on first publication, and collected thereafter; but it would be nice to have any available detail.
- What does the "imprint" actually signify, in the infobox? especially if the manga was serialized in the newspaper?
- I adjusted the infobox to say 3 volumes, in line with the summary, noting in case this isn't accurate.
- It would be useful to have a gloss for Japonica Polonica Fantastica
- Suggestion only: the first three sentences of "In Japan" are oddly ordered, to me: I would put the sentences about Ikeda together.
- "due to its Polish themes" - should this be "Polish setting"?
- It would be nice to have a date anchor in the lead for the setting; not all readers will know the time period being referenced
- Could please gloss Rzeczpospolita and Biuletyn EBIB?
- Similarly, Henriette de Vauban and Tadeusz Kościuszko?
- You sometimes refer to the main character as Price Jozef, and sometimes as Poniatowski - I'd lean toward the latter, but even if you go the other way be consistent in which you use.