This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Earlier today this stub was redirected by @Sitush: but was reverted by an IP without any reasoning. The same IP has also made a large number of edits to the userpage of @Abitoby:, who started the article. I agree with Sitush's analysis that notability isn't inherited, especially given the single citation in the article, which frankly is more about Pranab Mukherjee than it is about Suvra. I was tempted to revert the IP edit but given the unusual circumstances, I think this warrants a little discussion first. Green Giant (edits) (talk)15:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I did some digging after the IP revert (presumably logged out). Alas, Abitoby has had a few problems but they do have half an argument here. For example, we have Samantha Cameron and Michelle Obama. I'm still not convinced that we have enough to justify this article but if Abitoby or anyone else can find some serious meat to flesh this thing out then fair enough. - Sitush (talk) 15:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Same here, I am happy with leaving it as an article if there are some decent sources. The IP edits are what stopped me from reverting, because I could understand being logged out and making a couple of edits but to make thirty nine edits over five hours and not notice? That takes some dedication. :) Green Giant (edits) (talk)15:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]