Talk:Substantive law
Appearance
This level-5 vital article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Substantive rights can also be conferred by common law or precedent. Shouldn't this be added to the article?
- Added a teensy bit about that. PatrickR (talk) 23:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
It seems that a mention of the 14th Amendment (and the Slaughterhouse case) might be worth throwing in there. I guess that might make this article U.S. centric, but it's also not stopping someone from adding other case law. I don't know enough about it to do it myself, but maybe in a few weeks of reading, I may. Seer (talk) 19:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Minor grammatical edit
[edit]I tried editing the first sentence to be more grammatically correct, but it still seems wrong. I hope it is better than it was.