This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh
O.K......where do I start? This is not a proper Wikipedia article. It contains poor English, repeatedly flouts the 'no point of view' rule, has no citations and is so hopelessly biased towards its subject it looks like it has been written as hagiography by one of her relatives or close friends. Or maybe even by the subject herself? (I hope that last suggestion isn't the case because that REALLY WOULD be pathetic.) Anyone else agree? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.138.98.253 (talk) 08:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
O.K. - since the above criticism was made someone seems to have substantially reduced the length of the article. A lot of the weirder, inappropriate material has been removed, which is good. However, the wording in the existing article is still quite bizarre in places. In particular, the second paragraph could really do with a rewrite!
