Talk:Subiaco, Lazio
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Spelling
[edit]Isn’t this a British spelling article? The first version (largely taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia, as it happens), uses favour and favourite. —Ian Spackman 08:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 17 December 2024
[edit]
 | It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Clear primary topic based on wikinav stats and long term significance.Traumnovelle (talk) 23:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Pageviews show WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC. Theparties (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Why would Subiaco Oval be relevant here? The name isn't Subiaco it is Subiaco Oval. And plenty of pages are a primary topic but get less significantly less page views: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] just to provide a few examples where WP:PT2 has taken precedence over views. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:29, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Theparties. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:06, 18 December 2024 (UTC)