Talk:Strebe 1995 projection
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Are we sure we want to do this, User:Justinkunimune? The original scheme is much more informative. I’d prefer we switch out all the other projection’s diagrams with the more informative scheme. Strebe (talk) 19:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
I mostly just want them to be consistent. I personally think the plain Tissot's indicatrices one is a bit less cluttered and more intuitive, but that's just me. If you're willing to replace them all, I won't object.
Justin Kunimune (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
11E vs 11.25E
[edit]Any reason why Strebe preferred 11E and not (360/32:) 11.25E (Florence meridian) which is 3/4 (24/32) of an hour away from Greenwich? cf. File:Peters_projection,_date_line_in_Bering_strait.svg Euro2023 (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
