Talk:Steinbrücken Cave

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Caves

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of caving and cave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CavesWikipedia:WikiProject CavesTemplate:WikiProject CavesCaves

Untitled

There's far too little caving information in wikipedia. Anyone who has doubts that this is relevant information, please reconsider your opinion by surfing through List of transsexual porn stars. The purpose of pages about caving is so that your parents or friends can read something interesting when you say you are going down Steinbrückenhöhle, and they don't know what you are talking about. Also, if something dreadful happens down this cave (or any other cave), and the local newspaper reporter wants to find out the background on the terrible hole you lost your life in, this is probably going to be where they get their information -- if there is some relevant information here. So, with those purposes in mind, we want an idea of history, the amount of activity that has been going on, including details of any incidents people are going to want to include their story or conversations, and maybe a picture they can use. Everything should be properly cited to the technical sources, so they can follow up for more detailed information, and so on. Basically, in my opinion, if there's any poor coverage in the media about anything to do with caving, it's now entirely our own fault. We have the ability to fix it, and cover for what they don't have in their own internal libraries. Goatchurch 00:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to replace the porn stars list with another example seeing as it no longer exists (presumably deleted due to non-notability)... -Halidecyphon 14:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Seemed to have picked on a soft target. Category:Drag queens has 109 entries, so I don't think that is going anywhere fast.Goatchurch 23:13, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]