Jump to content

Talk:Spiritbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Touring

[edit]

The Touring section would be more appropriate on the album's article, Eternal Blue. I don't see the point in listing their entire touring history. Oroborvs (talk) 02:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now integrated. Not perfect, as I think I'm missing some big festivals (2022's Rock am Ring, Download, Aftershock, to name a few) but we have a good start. dannymusiceditor oops 17:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Josh on vocals

[edit]

Can anyone actually verify he does any vocal performance? I haven't found any sources on this information, but it keeps getting added back in. dannymusiceditor oops 00:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, maybe you guys are onto something after all. I can hear backing vocals that are unmistakably a dude's and not Courtney's on the brand new single that just dropped yesterday. But from what I can tell, it's all speculation right now and no one has confirmed it. mftp dan oops 01:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 15:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by DannyMusicEditor (talk) and Oroborvs (talk). Nominated by DannyMusicEditor (talk) at 01:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Spiritbox; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: None required.
Overall: @DannyMusicEditor: Good article, but the hooks are pretty bland. Could others be proposed. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC) Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onegreatjoke: I'd happily replace them if I could think of any others. DYK is not my forte. I thought the first one was pretty good with the added context, so I'm surprised, but I'll try to comb through and see if I find any others that stick out enough to me. Most of the material in here seems like pretty routine band encyclopedia history. I'd initially think to pull something from musical style, because they are pretty unique in that regard, but I don't know how I'd present it to make it look that way in the brevity that DYK asks for. dannymusiceditor oops 02:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onegreatjoke: Added one additional hook. I hope this is better, the article is a little tough to make a DYK hook for... dannymusiceditor oops 17:57, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, these three hooks could work but it would really depend on the promoter. Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:53, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]